Skip to main content

Googong vs Mount Druitt

Property investment comparison - Googong, NSW 2620 vs Mount Druitt, NSW 2770

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Googong wins 2, Mount Druitt wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGoogongMount Druitt
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$480K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%2.98%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.30%
1-year house growth+6.4%+6.2%
3-year house growth+7.6%+30.4%
Vacancy rate3.1%1.6%
Population7,44416,986

Googong vs Mount Druitt: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Googong and $1.1M in Mount Druitt.

On cash flow, Googong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.98% in Mount Druitt, a gap of 0.62 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.4% in Googong and +6.2% in Mount Druitt, so recent momentum favours Googong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Googong houses are +7.6% and Mount Druitt houses +30.4%, so Mount Druitt has compounded faster than Googong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Mount Druitt and 3.1% in Googong, so landlords in Mount Druitt face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mount Druitt is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,986 against 7,444, roughly 2.3 times the size of Googong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Googong for rental income, Googong for recent price momentum, Mount Druitt for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison