Skip to main content

Gooseberry Hill vs Riverton

Property investment comparison - Gooseberry Hill, WA 6076 vs Riverton, WA 6148

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gooseberry Hill wins 1, Riverton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGooseberry HillRiverton
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.95%4.10%
1-year house growth+16.1%+18.8%
3-year house growth+47.7%+78.1%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.0%
Population3,3236,078

Gooseberry Hill vs Riverton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Gooseberry Hill and $1.3M in Riverton.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.1% in Gooseberry Hill and +18.8% in Riverton, so recent momentum favours Riverton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Gooseberry Hill houses are +47.7% and Riverton houses +78.1%, so Riverton has compounded faster than Gooseberry Hill over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Riverton and 1.9% in Gooseberry Hill, so landlords in Riverton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Riverton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,078 against 3,323, larger than Gooseberry Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Riverton for recent price momentum, Riverton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison