Skip to main content

Gordonvale vs Scarness

Property investment comparison - Gordonvale, QLD 4865 vs Scarness, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gordonvale wins 3, Scarness wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGordonvaleScarness
Median house price$725K$725K
Median unit price-$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.90%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.08%-
1-year house growth+16.5%+14.1%
3-year house growth+45.8%+40.5%
Vacancy rate1.0%2.0%
Population6,9443,646

Gordonvale vs Scarness: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $725K in Gordonvale and $725K in Scarness.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.5% in Gordonvale and +14.1% in Scarness, so recent momentum favours Gordonvale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Gordonvale houses are +45.8% and Scarness houses +40.5%, so Gordonvale has compounded faster than Scarness over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Gordonvale and 2.0% in Scarness, so landlords in Gordonvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gordonvale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,944 against 3,646, larger than Scarness; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gordonvale for recent price momentum, Gordonvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison