Skip to main content

Goulburn vs Macksville

Property investment comparison - Goulburn, NSW 2580 vs Macksville, NSW 2447

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Goulburn wins 2, Macksville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGoulburnMacksville
Median house price$695K$695K
Median unit price$510K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.30%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%3.94%
1-year house growth+8.2%+8.0%
3-year house growth+14.4%+19.3%
Vacancy rate1.1%0.4%
Population23,9632,782

Goulburn vs Macksville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $695K in Goulburn and $695K in Macksville.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Goulburn and +8.0% in Macksville, so recent momentum favours Goulburn, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Goulburn houses are +14.4% and Macksville houses +19.3%, so Macksville has compounded faster than Goulburn over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Macksville and 1.1% in Goulburn, so landlords in Macksville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Goulburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,963 against 2,782, roughly 9 times the size of Macksville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Goulburn for recent price momentum, Macksville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison