Skip to main content

Goulburn vs Wauchope

Property investment comparison - Goulburn, NSW 2580 vs Wauchope, NSW 2446

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Goulburn wins 5, Wauchope wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGoulburnWauchope
Median house price$695K$700K
Median unit price$510K$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.46%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%4.18%
1-year house growth+8.2%+8.5%
3-year house growth+14.4%+9.0%
Vacancy rate1.1%2.2%
Population23,9636,589

Goulburn vs Wauchope: what the numbers say

The median house price is $695K in Goulburn and $700K in Wauchope, so Goulburn is the cheaper entry point, with Wauchope houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Goulburn sits at a median of $510K against $615K in Wauchope, which makes Goulburn the more affordable unit market and Wauchope the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Goulburn and +8.5% in Wauchope, so recent momentum favours Wauchope, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Goulburn houses are +14.4% and Wauchope houses +9.0%, so Goulburn has compounded faster than Wauchope over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Goulburn and 2.2% in Wauchope, so landlords in Goulburn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Goulburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,963 against 6,589, roughly 3.6 times the size of Wauchope; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Goulburn for a lower purchase price, Wauchope for recent price momentum, Goulburn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison