Skip to main content

Gowanbrae vs Yallambie

Property investment comparison - Gowanbrae, VIC 3043 vs Yallambie, VIC 3085

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gowanbrae wins 2, Yallambie wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGowanbraeYallambie
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.34%3.40%
Gross rental yield (units)3.93%-
1-year house growth+9.1%-1.0%
3-year house growth+17.9%+8.4%
Vacancy rate1.4%0.1%
Population2,9714,161

Gowanbrae vs Yallambie: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Gowanbrae and $1.0M in Yallambie.

On cash flow, Yallambie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.40%, compared with 3.34% in Gowanbrae, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.1% in Gowanbrae and -1.0% in Yallambie, so recent momentum favours Gowanbrae, while Yallambie went backwards.

Looking back three years, Gowanbrae houses are +17.9% and Yallambie houses +8.4%, so Gowanbrae has compounded faster than Yallambie over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Yallambie and 1.4% in Gowanbrae, so landlords in Yallambie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yallambie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,161 against 2,971, larger than Gowanbrae; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yallambie for rental income, Gowanbrae for recent price momentum, Yallambie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison