Skip to main content

Grantham Farm vs Robertson

Property investment comparison - Grantham Farm, NSW 2765 vs Robertson, NSW 2577

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Grantham Farm wins 3, Robertson wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGrantham FarmRobertson
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$860K$645K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)3.50%5.56%
1-year house growth+10.1%estimate+1.1%
3-year house growth-+2.4%
Vacancy rate6.2%3.4%
Population3,6692,017

Grantham Farm vs Robertson: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Grantham Farm and $1.2M in Robertson, so Grantham Farm is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Grantham Farm sits at a median of $860K against $645K in Robertson, which makes Robertson the more affordable unit market and Grantham Farm the pricier one.

On cash flow, Grantham Farm leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.20% in Robertson, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.1% in Grantham Farm (an estimate) and +1.1% in Robertson, so recent momentum favours Grantham Farm, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 3.4% in Robertson and 6.2% in Grantham Farm, so landlords in Robertson face less competition for tenants.

Grantham Farm is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,669 against 2,017, larger than Robertson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Grantham Farm for rental income, Grantham Farm for a lower purchase price, Grantham Farm for recent price momentum, Robertson for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison