Skip to main content

Green Point vs Hillvue

Property investment comparison - Green Point, NSW 2428 vs Hillvue, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Green Point wins 2, Hillvue wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreen PointHillvue
Median house price$715K$715K
Median unit price$545K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.36%4.03%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%4.70%
1-year house growth+3.0%estimate+11.7%
3-year house growth-+28.8%
Vacancy rate8.5%2.6%
Population5226,528

Green Point vs Hillvue: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $715K in Green Point and $715K in Hillvue.

On cash flow, Green Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.36%, compared with 4.03% in Hillvue, a gap of 0.33 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.0% in Green Point (an estimate) and +11.7% in Hillvue, so recent momentum favours Hillvue, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Hillvue and 8.5% in Green Point, so landlords in Hillvue face less competition for tenants.

Hillvue is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,528 against 522, roughly 13 times the size of Green Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Green Point for rental income, Hillvue for recent price momentum, Hillvue for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison