Skip to main content

Green Point vs Woodberry

Property investment comparison - Green Point, NSW 2428 vs Woodberry, NSW 2322

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Green Point wins 0, Woodberry wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGreen PointWoodberry
Median house price$715K$710K
Median unit price$545K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.36%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%7.24%
1-year house growth+3.0%estimate+15.7%
3-year house growth-+37.3%
Vacancy rate8.5%1.9%
Population5223,024

Green Point vs Woodberry: what the numbers say

The median house price is $715K in Green Point and $710K in Woodberry, so Woodberry is the cheaper entry point, with Green Point houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.36% in Green Point and 4.40% in Woodberry, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.0% in Green Point (an estimate) and +15.7% in Woodberry, so recent momentum favours Woodberry, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Woodberry and 8.5% in Green Point, so landlords in Woodberry face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woodberry is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,024 against 522, roughly 6 times the size of Green Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodberry for a lower purchase price, Woodberry for recent price momentum, Woodberry for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison