Gresford vs Tolland
Property investment comparison - Gresford, NSW 2311 vs Tolland, NSW 2650
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gresford wins 0, Tolland wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gresford | Tolland |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $625K | $625K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.08% | 4.19% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +19.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.1% | 2.4% |
| Population | 240 | 3,459 |
Gresford vs Tolland: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $625K in Gresford and $625K in Tolland.
On cash flow, Tolland leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 3.08% in Gresford, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Tolland and 4.1% in Gresford, so landlords in Tolland face less competition for tenants.
Tolland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,459 against 240, roughly 14 times the size of Gresford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tolland for rental income, Tolland for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison