Skip to main content

Griffith vs Westdale

Property investment comparison - Griffith, NSW 2680 vs Westdale, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Griffith wins 2, Westdale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGriffithWestdale
Median house price$650K$640K
Median unit price$455K$605K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.47%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.24%
1-year house growth+9.2%+15.2%estimate
3-year house growth+21.1%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.3%
Population19,5052,963

Griffith vs Westdale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $650K in Griffith and $640K in Westdale, so Westdale is the cheaper entry point, with Griffith houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Griffith sits at a median of $455K against $605K in Westdale, which makes Griffith the more affordable unit market and Westdale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.2% in Griffith and +15.2% in Westdale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Westdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Griffith and 2.3% in Westdale, so landlords in Griffith face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Griffith is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,505 against 2,963, roughly 7 times the size of Westdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Westdale for a lower purchase price, Westdale for recent price momentum, Griffith for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison