Skip to main content

Gulliver vs Slade Point

Property investment comparison - Gulliver, QLD 4812 vs Slade Point, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gulliver wins 2, Slade Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGulliverSlade Point
Median house price$630K$630K
Median unit price-$1.9M
Gross rental yield (houses)-5.62%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+20.8%+3.8%
3-year house growth+90.6%+65.5%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.3%
Population2,8843,450

Gulliver vs Slade Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $630K in Gulliver and $630K in Slade Point.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.8% in Gulliver and +3.8% in Slade Point, so recent momentum favours Gulliver, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Gulliver houses are +90.6% and Slade Point houses +65.5%, so Gulliver has compounded faster than Slade Point over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Slade Point and 1.6% in Gulliver, so landlords in Slade Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Slade Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,450 against 2,884, larger than Gulliver; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gulliver for recent price momentum, Slade Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Gulliver vs Slade Point: Suburb Comparison 2026