Skip to main content

Hacketts Gully vs Winthrop

Property investment comparison - Hacketts Gully, WA 6076 vs Winthrop, WA 6150

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hacketts Gully wins 2, Winthrop wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHacketts GullyWinthrop
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.34%2.96%
Gross rental yield (units)-1.75%
1-year house growth-+12.4%
3-year house growth-+41.7%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.8%
Population556,020

Hacketts Gully vs Winthrop: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Hacketts Gully and $1.8M in Winthrop, so Winthrop is the cheaper entry point, with Hacketts Gully houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Hacketts Gully leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.34%, compared with 2.96% in Winthrop, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Hacketts Gully and 1.8% in Winthrop, so landlords in Hacketts Gully face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Winthrop is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,020 against 55, roughly 109 times the size of Hacketts Gully; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hacketts Gully for rental income, Winthrop for a lower purchase price, Hacketts Gully for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison