Skip to main content

Haigslea vs Kunda Park

Property investment comparison - Haigslea, QLD 4306 vs Kunda Park, QLD 4556

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Haigslea wins 3, Kunda Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHaigsleaKunda Park
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$730K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.65%3.34%
Gross rental yield (units)3.56%8.09%
1-year house growth+11.8%+7.2%estimate
3-year house growth+54.5%-
Vacancy rate4.2%5.1%
Population50722

Haigslea vs Kunda Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Haigslea and $1.4M in Kunda Park, so Haigslea is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Haigslea sits at a median of $730K against $455K in Kunda Park, which makes Kunda Park the more affordable unit market and Haigslea the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kunda Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.34%, compared with 1.65% in Haigslea, a gap of 1.69 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.8% in Haigslea and +7.2% in Kunda Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Haigslea, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 4.2% in Haigslea and 5.1% in Kunda Park, so landlords in Haigslea face less competition for tenants.

Haigslea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 507 against 22, roughly 23 times the size of Kunda Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kunda Park for rental income, Haigslea for a lower purchase price, Haigslea for recent price momentum, Haigslea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison