Skip to main content

Halls Head vs Mount Nasura

Property investment comparison - Halls Head, WA 6210 vs Mount Nasura, WA 6112

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Halls Head wins 2, Mount Nasura wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHalls HeadMount Nasura
Median house price$905K$910K
Median unit price$690K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.13%
1-year house growth+14.8%+20.1%
3-year house growth+62.1%+61.7%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.2%
Population14,4742,997

Halls Head vs Mount Nasura: what the numbers say

The median house price is $905K in Halls Head and $910K in Mount Nasura, so Halls Head is the cheaper entry point, with Mount Nasura houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.8% in Halls Head and +20.1% in Mount Nasura, so recent momentum favours Mount Nasura, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Halls Head houses are +62.1% and Mount Nasura houses +61.7%, so Halls Head has compounded faster than Mount Nasura over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Mount Nasura and 1.9% in Halls Head, so landlords in Mount Nasura face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Halls Head is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,474 against 2,997, roughly 4.8 times the size of Mount Nasura; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Halls Head for a lower purchase price, Mount Nasura for recent price momentum, Mount Nasura for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison