Hallsville vs Hamlyn
Property investment comparison - Hallsville, NSW 2340 vs Hamlyn, NSW 2259
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hallsville wins 3, Hamlyn wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hallsville | Hamlyn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | $370K | $695K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.83% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.94% | 4.74% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.9% | +9.9% |
| 3-year house growth | +33.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 0.9% |
| Population | 642 | - |
Hallsville vs Hamlyn: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Hallsville and $1.0M in Hamlyn.
For units, Hallsville sits at a median of $370K against $695K in Hamlyn, which makes Hallsville the more affordable unit market and Hamlyn the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +14.9% in Hallsville and +9.9% in Hamlyn, so recent momentum favours Hallsville, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Hamlyn and 2.0% in Hallsville, so landlords in Hamlyn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
In short: Hallsville for recent price momentum, Hamlyn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison