Skip to main content

Hamilton Hill vs Jane Brook

Property investment comparison - Hamilton Hill, WA 6163 vs Jane Brook, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton Hill wins 1, Jane Brook wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamilton HillJane Brook
Median house price$1M$1M
Median unit price$650K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%4.22%
Gross rental yield (units)4.84%5.25%
1-year house growth+14.3%+16.4%estimate
3-year house growth+63.0%-
Vacancy rate0.5%1.3%
Population11,3273,670

Hamilton Hill vs Jane Brook: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Hamilton Hill and $1M in Jane Brook.

On cash flow, Jane Brook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.22%, compared with 3.90% in Hamilton Hill, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.3% in Hamilton Hill and +16.4% in Jane Brook (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Jane Brook, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Hamilton Hill and 1.3% in Jane Brook, so landlords in Hamilton Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,327 against 3,670, roughly 3.1 times the size of Jane Brook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jane Brook for rental income, Jane Brook for recent price momentum, Hamilton Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison