Skip to main content

Hamilton Valley vs Kooringal

Property investment comparison - Hamilton Valley, NSW 2641 vs Kooringal, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton Valley wins 1, Kooringal wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamilton ValleyKooringal
Median house price$670K$660K
Median unit price-$385K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.24%4.30%
Gross rental yield (units)3.55%5.20%
1-year house growth+11.3%estimate+13.8%
3-year house growth-+30.9%
Vacancy rate2.4%2.5%
Population8347,404

Hamilton Valley vs Kooringal: what the numbers say

The median house price is $670K in Hamilton Valley and $660K in Kooringal, so Kooringal is the cheaper entry point, with Hamilton Valley houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Kooringal leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 4.24% in Hamilton Valley, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.3% in Hamilton Valley (an estimate) and +13.8% in Kooringal, so recent momentum favours Kooringal, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Hamilton Valley and 2.5% in Kooringal, so landlords in Hamilton Valley face less competition for tenants.

Kooringal is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,404 against 834, roughly 9 times the size of Hamilton Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kooringal for rental income, Kooringal for a lower purchase price, Kooringal for recent price momentum, Hamilton Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison