Skip to main content

Hamilton vs Victoria Valley

Property investment comparison - Hamilton, VIC 3300 vs Victoria Valley, VIC 3294

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hamilton wins 3, Victoria Valley wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamiltonVictoria Valley
Median house price$440K$445K
Median unit price$325K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.76%4.70%
Gross rental yield (units)5.53%-
1-year house growth+10.6%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.3%0.9%
Population10,34665

Hamilton vs Victoria Valley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $440K in Hamilton and $445K in Victoria Valley, so Hamilton is the cheaper entry point, with Victoria Valley houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Hamilton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.76%, compared with 4.70% in Victoria Valley, a gap of 0.06 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Hamilton and 0.9% in Victoria Valley, so landlords in Hamilton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hamilton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,346 against 65, roughly 159 times the size of Victoria Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hamilton for rental income, Hamilton for a lower purchase price, Hamilton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison