Skip to main content

Hammondville vs Mount Pritchard

Property investment comparison - Hammondville, NSW 2170 vs Mount Pritchard, NSW 2170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hammondville wins 3, Mount Pritchard wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHammondvilleMount Pritchard
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$850K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%2.82%
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%3.76%
1-year house growth+7.9%+6.4%
3-year house growth+27.7%+35.0%
Vacancy rate3.2%2.0%
Population3,69110,426

Hammondville vs Mount Pritchard: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Hammondville and $1.2M in Mount Pritchard.

On cash flow, Hammondville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.82% in Mount Pritchard, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Hammondville and +6.4% in Mount Pritchard, so recent momentum favours Hammondville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hammondville houses are +27.7% and Mount Pritchard houses +35.0%, so Mount Pritchard has compounded faster than Hammondville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Mount Pritchard and 3.2% in Hammondville, so landlords in Mount Pritchard face less competition for tenants.

Mount Pritchard is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,426 against 3,691, roughly 2.8 times the size of Hammondville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hammondville for rental income, Hammondville for recent price momentum, Mount Pritchard for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison