Skip to main content

Hammondville vs Oran Park

Property investment comparison - Hammondville, NSW 2170 vs Oran Park, NSW 2570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hammondville wins 1, Oran Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHammondvilleOran Park
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$850K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%-
1-year house growth+7.9%+9.9%
3-year house growth+27.7%+11.0%
Vacancy rate3.2%2.5%
Population3,69117,624

Hammondville vs Oran Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Hammondville and $1.2M in Oran Park.

For units, Hammondville sits at a median of $850K against $820K in Oran Park, which makes Oran Park the more affordable unit market and Hammondville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Hammondville and +9.9% in Oran Park, so recent momentum favours Oran Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hammondville houses are +27.7% and Oran Park houses +11.0%, so Hammondville has compounded faster than Oran Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Oran Park and 3.2% in Hammondville, so landlords in Oran Park face less competition for tenants.

Oran Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,624 against 3,691, roughly 4.8 times the size of Hammondville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oran Park for recent price momentum, Oran Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Hammondville vs Oran Park: Suburb Comparison 2026