Skip to main content

Hampton vs Oxley

Property investment comparison - Hampton, QLD 4352 vs Oxley, QLD 4075

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hampton wins 3, Oxley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamptonOxley
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$285K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.09%
Gross rental yield (units)9.33%4.13%
1-year house growth+20.0%+19.6%
3-year house growth+38.1%+53.8%
Vacancy rate4.6%0.7%
Population4699,100

Hampton vs Oxley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Hampton and $1.2M in Oxley, so Oxley is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Hampton sits at a median of $285K against $820K in Oxley, which makes Hampton the more affordable unit market and Oxley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.0% in Hampton and +19.6% in Oxley, so recent momentum favours Hampton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hampton houses are +38.1% and Oxley houses +53.8%, so Oxley has compounded faster than Hampton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Oxley and 4.6% in Hampton, so landlords in Oxley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oxley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,100 against 469, roughly 19 times the size of Hampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oxley for a lower purchase price, Hampton for recent price momentum, Oxley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison