Skip to main content

Hampton vs Woorim

Property investment comparison - Hampton, QLD 4352 vs Woorim, QLD 4507

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hampton wins 3, Woorim wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHamptonWoorim
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$285K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)9.33%-
1-year house growth+20.0%+16.4%
3-year house growth+38.1%+37.0%
Vacancy rate4.6%0.6%
Population4691,843

Hampton vs Woorim: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Hampton and $1.2M in Woorim, so Hampton is the cheaper entry point, with Woorim houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.0% in Hampton and +16.4% in Woorim, so recent momentum favours Hampton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hampton houses are +38.1% and Woorim houses +37.0%, so Hampton has compounded faster than Woorim over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Woorim and 4.6% in Hampton, so landlords in Woorim face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woorim is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,843 against 469, roughly 3.9 times the size of Hampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hampton for a lower purchase price, Hampton for recent price momentum, Woorim for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison