Skip to main content

Harcourt North vs Surrey Hills

Property investment comparison - Harcourt North, VIC 3453 vs Surrey Hills, VIC 3127

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Harcourt North wins 3, Surrey Hills wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHarcourt NorthSurrey Hills
Median house price$2.1M$2.2M
Median unit price$735K$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.33%2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.94%
1-year house growth--6.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.3%2.6%
Population29113,655

Harcourt North vs Surrey Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Harcourt North and $2.2M in Surrey Hills, so Harcourt North is the cheaper entry point, with Surrey Hills houses about 3% dearer.

For units, Harcourt North sits at a median of $735K against $900K in Surrey Hills, which makes Harcourt North the more affordable unit market and Surrey Hills the pricier one.

On cash flow, Surrey Hills leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.23%, compared with 1.33% in Harcourt North, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Harcourt North and 2.6% in Surrey Hills, so landlords in Harcourt North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Surrey Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,655 against 291, roughly 47 times the size of Harcourt North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Surrey Hills for rental income, Harcourt North for a lower purchase price, Harcourt North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison