Skip to main content

Hassall Grove vs Koolewong

Property investment comparison - Hassall Grove, NSW 2761 vs Koolewong, NSW 2256

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hassall Grove wins 1, Koolewong wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHassall GroveKoolewong
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)3.01%4.27%
1-year house growth+8.9%estimate+8.8%
3-year house growth-+11.9%
Vacancy rate2.1%1.0%
Population4,401920

Hassall Grove vs Koolewong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Hassall Grove and $1.1M in Koolewong, so Koolewong is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Hassall Grove (an estimate) and +8.8% in Koolewong, so recent momentum favours Hassall Grove, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Koolewong and 2.1% in Hassall Grove, so landlords in Koolewong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hassall Grove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,401 against 920, roughly 4.8 times the size of Koolewong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Koolewong for a lower purchase price, Hassall Grove for recent price momentum, Koolewong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison