Skip to main content

Hastings vs Maldon

Property investment comparison - Hastings, VIC 3915 vs Maldon, VIC 3463

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hastings wins 5, Maldon wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHastingsMaldon
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$590K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.13%3.33%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%3.35%
1-year house growth+5.7%+4.5%
3-year house growth+2.2%-1.7%
Vacancy rate0.5%1.9%
Population10,3691,665

Hastings vs Maldon: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Hastings and $730K in Maldon.

On cash flow, Hastings leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.13%, compared with 3.33% in Maldon, a gap of 0.80 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.7% in Hastings and +4.5% in Maldon, so recent momentum favours Hastings, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hastings houses are +2.2% and Maldon houses -1.7%, so Hastings has compounded faster than Maldon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Hastings and 1.9% in Maldon, so landlords in Hastings face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hastings is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,369 against 1,665, roughly 6 times the size of Maldon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hastings for rental income, Hastings for recent price momentum, Hastings for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison