Hay vs Terry Hie Hie
Property investment comparison - Hay, NSW 2711 vs Terry Hie Hie, NSW 2400
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hay wins 1, Terry Hie Hie wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hay | Terry Hie Hie |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $310K | $305K |
| Median unit price | - | $190K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 8.65% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 8.89% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 1.7% |
| Population | 2,300 | 76 |
Hay vs Terry Hie Hie: what the numbers say
The median house price is $310K in Hay and $305K in Terry Hie Hie, so Terry Hie Hie is the cheaper entry point, with Hay houses about 2% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Hay and 1.7% in Terry Hie Hie, so landlords in Hay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Hay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,300 against 76, roughly 30 times the size of Terry Hie Hie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Terry Hie Hie for a lower purchase price, Hay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison