Hebersham vs Minmi
Property investment comparison - Hebersham, NSW 2770 vs Minmi, NSW 2287
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hebersham wins 1, Minmi wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hebersham | Minmi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $965K | $960K |
| Median unit price | - | $645K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.33% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +9.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +30.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 5.6% |
| Population | 5,643 | 700 |
Hebersham vs Minmi: what the numbers say
The median house price is $965K in Hebersham and $960K in Minmi, so Minmi is the cheaper entry point, with Hebersham houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Hebersham and 5.6% in Minmi, so landlords in Hebersham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Hebersham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,643 against 700, roughly 8 times the size of Minmi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Minmi for a lower purchase price, Hebersham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison