Skip to main content

Hemmant vs Jamboree Heights

Property investment comparison - Hemmant, QLD 4174 vs Jamboree Heights, QLD 4074

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hemmant wins 3, Jamboree Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHemmantJamboree Heights
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.33%
Gross rental yield (units)3.26%2.84%
1-year house growth+11.6%+19.0%
3-year house growth+42.5%+45.4%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.1%
Population2,8863,141

Hemmant vs Jamboree Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Hemmant and $1.1M in Jamboree Heights, so Hemmant is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.6% in Hemmant and +19.0% in Jamboree Heights, so recent momentum favours Jamboree Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hemmant houses are +42.5% and Jamboree Heights houses +45.4%, so Jamboree Heights has compounded faster than Hemmant over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Hemmant and 1.1% in Jamboree Heights, so landlords in Hemmant face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Jamboree Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,141 against 2,886, larger than Hemmant; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hemmant for a lower purchase price, Jamboree Heights for recent price momentum, Hemmant for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison