Skip to main content

Hemmant vs Oxley

Property investment comparison - Hemmant, QLD 4174 vs Oxley, QLD 4075

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hemmant wins 2, Oxley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHemmantOxley
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$825K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.25%
Gross rental yield (units)3.26%4.07%
1-year house growth+11.6%+20.3%
3-year house growth+42.5%+48.1%
Vacancy rate0.4%0.7%
Population2,8869,100

Hemmant vs Oxley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Hemmant and $1.1M in Oxley, so Hemmant is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.6% in Hemmant and +20.3% in Oxley, so recent momentum favours Oxley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Hemmant houses are +42.5% and Oxley houses +48.1%, so Oxley has compounded faster than Hemmant over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Hemmant and 0.7% in Oxley, so landlords in Hemmant face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oxley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,100 against 2,886, roughly 3.2 times the size of Hemmant; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hemmant for a lower purchase price, Oxley for recent price momentum, Hemmant for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison