Henley vs Mosman
Property investment comparison - Henley, NSW 2111 vs Mosman, NSW 2088
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Henley wins 1, Mosman wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Henley | Mosman |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $6.3M | $5.3M |
| Median unit price | - | $1.4M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.15% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | -8.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Population | 455 | 28,329 |
Henley vs Mosman: what the numbers say
The median house price is $6.3M in Henley and $5.3M in Mosman, so Mosman is the cheaper entry point, with Henley houses about 18% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Henley and 1.8% in Mosman, so landlords in Henley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mosman is the bigger suburb, with a population of 28,329 against 455, roughly 62 times the size of Henley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mosman for a lower purchase price, Henley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison