Henty vs Wantagong
Property investment comparison - Henty, NSW 2658 vs Wantagong, NSW 2644
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Henty wins 1, Wantagong wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Henty | Wantagong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $380K | $380K |
| Median unit price | $315K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.27% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.29% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +8.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +16.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 2.1% |
| Population | 1,225 | 76 |
Henty vs Wantagong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $380K in Henty and $380K in Wantagong.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Henty and 2.1% in Wantagong, so landlords in Henty face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Henty is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,225 against 76, roughly 16 times the size of Wantagong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Henty for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison