Henty vs Mount Beauty
Property investment comparison - Henty, VIC 3312 vs Mount Beauty, VIC 3699
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Henty wins 0, Mount Beauty wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Henty | Mount Beauty |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $540K | $540K |
| Median unit price | - | $305K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.16% | 4.67% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +4.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.6% |
| Population | 75 | 910 |
Henty vs Mount Beauty: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $540K in Henty and $540K in Mount Beauty.
On cash flow, Mount Beauty leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.67%, compared with 3.16% in Henty, a gap of 1.51 percentage points.
Mount Beauty is the bigger suburb, with a population of 910 against 75, roughly 12 times the size of Henty; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mount Beauty for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison