Skip to main content

Hideaway Bay vs Zillmere

Property investment comparison - Hideaway Bay, QLD 4800 vs Zillmere, QLD 4034

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hideaway Bay wins 2, Zillmere wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHideaway BayZillmere
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$630K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%3.34%
Gross rental yield (units)3.05%4.15%
1-year house growth+13.3%estimate+15.0%
3-year house growth-+54.5%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population2329,323

Hideaway Bay vs Zillmere: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Hideaway Bay and $1.1M in Zillmere.

For units, Hideaway Bay sits at a median of $630K against $750K in Zillmere, which makes Hideaway Bay the more affordable unit market and Zillmere the pricier one.

On cash flow, Zillmere leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.34%, compared with 3.20% in Hideaway Bay, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.3% in Hideaway Bay (an estimate) and +15.0% in Zillmere, so recent momentum favours Zillmere, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Hideaway Bay and 1.0% in Zillmere, so landlords in Hideaway Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Zillmere is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,323 against 232, roughly 40 times the size of Hideaway Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Zillmere for rental income, Zillmere for recent price momentum, Hideaway Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison