Skip to main content

High Wycombe vs Lynwood

Property investment comparison - High Wycombe, WA 6057 vs Lynwood, WA 6147

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: High Wycombe wins 1, Lynwood wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHigh WycombeLynwood
Median house price$880K$880K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)4.54%5.20%
1-year house growth+19.3%+19.6%
3-year house growth+63.8%+76.2%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.2%
Population12,1983,541

High Wycombe vs Lynwood: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $880K in High Wycombe and $880K in Lynwood.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.40% in High Wycombe and 4.40% in Lynwood, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.3% in High Wycombe and +19.6% in Lynwood, so recent momentum favours Lynwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, High Wycombe houses are +63.8% and Lynwood houses +76.2%, so Lynwood has compounded faster than High Wycombe over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in High Wycombe and 1.2% in Lynwood, so landlords in High Wycombe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

High Wycombe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,198 against 3,541, roughly 3.4 times the size of Lynwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lynwood for recent price momentum, High Wycombe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison