Skip to main content

Highbury vs South Plympton

Property investment comparison - Highbury, SA 5089 vs South Plympton, SA 5038

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Highbury wins 3, South Plympton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHighburySouth Plympton
Median house price$1.1M$1.2M
Median unit price-$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%3.06%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.72%
1-year house growth+17.4%estimate+11.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.8%0.9%
Population6,9564,721

Highbury vs South Plympton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Highbury and $1.2M in South Plympton, so Highbury is the cheaper entry point, with South Plympton houses about 6% dearer.

On cash flow, Highbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 3.06% in South Plympton, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.4% in Highbury (an estimate) and +11.9% in South Plympton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Highbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in South Plympton and 1.8% in Highbury, so landlords in South Plympton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Highbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,956 against 4,721, larger than South Plympton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Highbury for rental income, Highbury for a lower purchase price, Highbury for recent price momentum, South Plympton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison