Skip to main content

Highfields vs Windaroo

Property investment comparison - Highfields, QLD 4352 vs Windaroo, QLD 4207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Highfields wins 2, Windaroo wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHighfieldsWindaroo
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.68%
1-year house growth+15.5%+18.8%
3-year house growth+44.2%+41.0%
Vacancy rate0.3%1.6%
Population8,5682,771

Highfields vs Windaroo: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Highfields and $1.1M in Windaroo.

On cash flow, Windaroo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.39% in Highfields, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.5% in Highfields and +18.8% in Windaroo, so recent momentum favours Windaroo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Highfields houses are +44.2% and Windaroo houses +41.0%, so Highfields has compounded faster than Windaroo over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Highfields and 1.6% in Windaroo, so landlords in Highfields face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Highfields is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,568 against 2,771, roughly 3.1 times the size of Windaroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windaroo for rental income, Windaroo for recent price momentum, Highfields for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison