Skip to main content

Hillcrest vs Sandstone Point

Property investment comparison - Hillcrest, QLD 4118 vs Sandstone Point, QLD 4511

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hillcrest wins 4, Sandstone Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHillcrestSandstone Point
Median house price$930K$925K
Median unit price$665K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.07%3.69%
1-year house growth+17.9%+9.8%estimate
3-year house growth+45.6%-
Vacancy rate0.7%1.0%
Population6,2684,094

Hillcrest vs Sandstone Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $930K in Hillcrest and $925K in Sandstone Point, so Sandstone Point is the cheaper entry point, with Hillcrest houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Hillcrest sits at a median of $665K against $750K in Sandstone Point, which makes Hillcrest the more affordable unit market and Sandstone Point the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.9% in Hillcrest and +9.8% in Sandstone Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hillcrest, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Hillcrest and 1.0% in Sandstone Point, so landlords in Hillcrest face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hillcrest is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,268 against 4,094, larger than Sandstone Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sandstone Point for a lower purchase price, Hillcrest for recent price momentum, Hillcrest for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison