Hillsborough vs Mudgee
Property investment comparison - Hillsborough, NSW 2320 vs Mudgee, NSW 2850
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hillsborough wins 2, Mudgee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hillsborough | Mudgee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $740K |
| Median unit price | $525K | $510K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.40% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.36% | 5.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +6.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +5.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 2.7% |
| Population | 50 | 11,457 |
Hillsborough vs Mudgee: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Hillsborough and $740K in Mudgee.
For units, Hillsborough sits at a median of $525K against $510K in Mudgee, which makes Mudgee the more affordable unit market and Hillsborough the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Hillsborough and 2.7% in Mudgee, so landlords in Hillsborough face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mudgee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,457 against 50, roughly 229 times the size of Hillsborough; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hillsborough for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison