Skip to main content

Hillvue vs Singleton

Property investment comparison - Hillvue, NSW 2340 vs Singleton, NSW 2330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hillvue wins 1, Singleton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHillvueSingleton
Median house price$715K$715K
Median unit price-$430K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%4.61%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%-
1-year house growth+11.7%+8.8%estimate
3-year house growth+28.8%-
Vacancy rate2.6%0.8%
Population6,5285,185

Hillvue vs Singleton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $715K in Hillvue and $715K in Singleton.

On cash flow, Singleton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.61%, compared with 4.03% in Hillvue, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Hillvue and +8.8% in Singleton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hillvue, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Singleton and 2.6% in Hillvue, so landlords in Singleton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hillvue is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,528 against 5,185, larger than Singleton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Singleton for rental income, Hillvue for recent price momentum, Singleton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison