Skip to main content

Holmview vs Oakhurst

Property investment comparison - Holmview, QLD 4207 vs Oakhurst, QLD 4650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Holmview wins 4, Oakhurst wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHolmviewOakhurst
Median house price$885K$880K
Median unit price-$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.23%
Gross rental yield (units)3.55%3.94%
1-year house growth+16.5%+13.4%
3-year house growth+45.4%+34.6%
Vacancy rate1.0%3.5%
Population4,4551,717

Holmview vs Oakhurst: what the numbers say

The median house price is $885K in Holmview and $880K in Oakhurst, so Oakhurst is the cheaper entry point, with Holmview houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Holmview leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.23% in Oakhurst, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.5% in Holmview and +13.4% in Oakhurst, so recent momentum favours Holmview, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Holmview houses are +45.4% and Oakhurst houses +34.6%, so Holmview has compounded faster than Oakhurst over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Holmview and 3.5% in Oakhurst, so landlords in Holmview face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Holmview is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,455 against 1,717, roughly 2.6 times the size of Oakhurst; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Holmview for rental income, Oakhurst for a lower purchase price, Holmview for recent price momentum, Holmview for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison