Skip to main content

Holsworthy vs Regentville

Property investment comparison - Holsworthy, NSW 2173 vs Regentville, NSW 2745

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Holsworthy wins 3, Regentville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHolsworthyRegentville
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%2.66%
Gross rental yield (units)3.84%4.56%
1-year house growth+6.3%+10.2%estimate
3-year house growth+25.2%-
Vacancy rate2.4%2.8%
Population5,657829

Holsworthy vs Regentville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Holsworthy and $1.3M in Regentville, so Holsworthy is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Holsworthy leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.66% in Regentville, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.3% in Holsworthy and +10.2% in Regentville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Regentville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Holsworthy and 2.8% in Regentville, so landlords in Holsworthy face less competition for tenants.

Holsworthy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,657 against 829, roughly 7 times the size of Regentville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Holsworthy for rental income, Holsworthy for a lower purchase price, Regentville for recent price momentum, Holsworthy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison