Skip to main content

Holsworthy vs Wallalong

Property investment comparison - Holsworthy, NSW 2173 vs Wallalong, NSW 2320

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Holsworthy wins 3, Wallalong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHolsworthyWallalong
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price-$525K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%2.75%
Gross rental yield (units)3.84%6.04%
1-year house growth+6.3%-
3-year house growth+25.2%+42.0%
Vacancy rate2.4%12.6%
Population5,6571,049

Holsworthy vs Wallalong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Holsworthy and $1.3M in Wallalong, so Holsworthy is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Holsworthy leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.75% in Wallalong, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Holsworthy houses are +25.2% and Wallalong houses +42.0%, so Wallalong has compounded faster than Holsworthy over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Holsworthy and 12.6% in Wallalong, so landlords in Holsworthy face less competition for tenants.

Holsworthy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,657 against 1,049, roughly 5 times the size of Wallalong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Holsworthy for rental income, Holsworthy for a lower purchase price, Holsworthy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison