Homebush vs Kenthurst

The median house price is $3.3M in Homebush and $3.3M in Kenthurst, so Kenthurst is the cheaper entry point, with Homebush houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Homebush sits at a median of $670K against $1.4M in Kenthurst, which makes Homebush the more affordable unit market and Kenthurst the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kenthurst leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 1.64%, compared with 1.42% in Homebush, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.3% in Homebush (an estimate) and -7.7% in Kenthurst, so recent momentum favours Homebush, while Kenthurst went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Homebush and 3.1% in Kenthurst, so landlords in Homebush face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Homebush is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,660 against 5,313, roughly 2.2 times the size of Kenthurst; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kenthurst for rental income, Kenthurst for a lower purchase price, Homebush for recent price momentum, Homebush for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.