Skip to main content

Hoxton Park vs Kurrajong Heights

Property investment comparison - Hoxton Park, NSW 2171 vs Kurrajong Heights, NSW 2758

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hoxton Park wins 1, Kurrajong Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHoxton ParkKurrajong Heights
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$3.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%3.24%
Gross rental yield (units)4.19%-
1-year house growth+7.6%estimate+7.9%
3-year house growth-+27.1%
Vacancy rate2.2%8.5%
Population4,5721,255

Hoxton Park vs Kurrajong Heights: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Hoxton Park and $1.2M in Kurrajong Heights.

On cash flow, Kurrajong Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.24%, compared with 2.99% in Hoxton Park, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.6% in Hoxton Park (an estimate) and +7.9% in Kurrajong Heights, so recent momentum favours Kurrajong Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Hoxton Park and 8.5% in Kurrajong Heights, so landlords in Hoxton Park face less competition for tenants.

Hoxton Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,572 against 1,255, roughly 3.6 times the size of Kurrajong Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kurrajong Heights for rental income, Kurrajong Heights for recent price momentum, Hoxton Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison