Skip to main content

Huntly vs Jackass Flat

Property investment comparison - Huntly, VIC 3551 vs Jackass Flat, VIC 3556

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Huntly wins 0, Jackass Flat wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHuntlyJackass Flat
Median house price$650K$650K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.64%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.85%
1-year house growth+10.2%+13.5%
3-year house growth+12.4%+26.2%
Vacancy rate4.5%0.8%
Population3,5851,907

Huntly vs Jackass Flat: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $650K in Huntly and $650K in Jackass Flat.

On cash flow, Jackass Flat leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.64%, compared with 4.40% in Huntly, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.2% in Huntly and +13.5% in Jackass Flat, so recent momentum favours Jackass Flat, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Huntly houses are +12.4% and Jackass Flat houses +26.2%, so Jackass Flat has compounded faster than Huntly over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Jackass Flat and 4.5% in Huntly, so landlords in Jackass Flat face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Huntly is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,585 against 1,907, larger than Jackass Flat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jackass Flat for rental income, Jackass Flat for recent price momentum, Jackass Flat for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison