Skip to main content

Huntly vs Kennington

Property investment comparison - Huntly, VIC 3551 vs Kennington, VIC 3550

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Huntly wins 2, Kennington wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHuntlyKennington
Median house price$650K$650K
Median unit price-$470K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.09%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.79%
1-year house growth+10.2%+10.8%
3-year house growth+12.4%+4.1%
Vacancy rate4.5%1.2%
Population3,5855,880

Huntly vs Kennington: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $650K in Huntly and $650K in Kennington.

On cash flow, Huntly leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.09% in Kennington, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.2% in Huntly and +10.8% in Kennington, so recent momentum favours Kennington, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Huntly houses are +12.4% and Kennington houses +4.1%, so Huntly has compounded faster than Kennington over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Kennington and 4.5% in Huntly, so landlords in Kennington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kennington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,880 against 3,585, larger than Huntly; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Huntly for rental income, Kennington for recent price momentum, Kennington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison