Skip to main content

Huntly vs Wodonga

Property investment comparison - Huntly, VIC 3551 vs Wodonga, VIC 3690

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Huntly wins 0, Wodonga wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHuntlyWodonga
Median house price$650K$645K
Median unit price-$415K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.33%
1-year house growth+10.2%+12.3%
3-year house growth+12.4%+18.4%
Vacancy rate4.5%1.4%
Population3,58520,259

Huntly vs Wodonga: what the numbers say

The median house price is $650K in Huntly and $645K in Wodonga, so Wodonga is the cheaper entry point, with Huntly houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.40% in Huntly and 4.40% in Wodonga, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.2% in Huntly and +12.3% in Wodonga, so recent momentum favours Wodonga, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Huntly houses are +12.4% and Wodonga houses +18.4%, so Wodonga has compounded faster than Huntly over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Wodonga and 4.5% in Huntly, so landlords in Wodonga face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wodonga is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,259 against 3,585, roughly 6 times the size of Huntly; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wodonga for a lower purchase price, Wodonga for recent price momentum, Wodonga for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Huntly vs Wodonga: Property Investment Comparison (2026)