Skip to main content

Illawong vs Lidcombe

Property investment comparison - Illawong, NSW 2234 vs Lidcombe, NSW 2141

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Illawong wins 1, Lidcombe wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIllawongLidcombe
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$1.2M$790K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)-5.35%
1-year house growth+7.8%+9.7%
3-year house growth+20.3%+31.0%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.6%
Population7,42723,663

Illawong vs Lidcombe: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Illawong and $2.0M in Lidcombe, so Illawong is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Illawong sits at a median of $1.2M against $790K in Lidcombe, which makes Lidcombe the more affordable unit market and Illawong the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.8% in Illawong and +9.7% in Lidcombe, so recent momentum favours Lidcombe, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Illawong houses are +20.3% and Lidcombe houses +31.0%, so Lidcombe has compounded faster than Illawong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Lidcombe and 1.8% in Illawong, so landlords in Lidcombe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lidcombe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,663 against 7,427, roughly 3.2 times the size of Illawong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Illawong for a lower purchase price, Lidcombe for recent price momentum, Lidcombe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison