Skip to main content

Image vs Windaroo

Property investment comparison - Image, QLD 4560 vs Windaroo, QLD 4207

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Image wins 5, Windaroo wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricImageWindaroo
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$735K$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.31%3.68%
1-year house growth-+18.8%
3-year house growth-+41.0%
Vacancy rate0.3%1.6%
Population17,3922,771

Image vs Windaroo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Image and $1.1M in Windaroo, so Image is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Image sits at a median of $735K against $745K in Windaroo, which makes Image the more affordable unit market and Windaroo the pricier one.

On cash flow, Image leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 3.80% in Windaroo, a gap of 0.14 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Image and 1.6% in Windaroo, so landlords in Image face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Image is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,392 against 2,771, roughly 6 times the size of Windaroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Image for rental income, Image for a lower purchase price, Image for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison